Sunday, July 18, 2010

Real Estate: The Original Pyramid Scheme

Today I'm skipping the humor and going with a serious post.

I'm not in real estate, nor do I have a background in economics or finance. But as an observer and participant, I have to ask: Is real estate really a glorified pyramid scheme playing out before us in slow motion?

According to Wikipedia, "a pyramid scheme is a non-sustainable business model that involves the exchange of money primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme, without any product or service being delivered."

Personally speaking, I think residential real estate is heading towards non-sustainable. A product is clearly delivered (your house) but can only have value if there is someone willing and able to purchase that property when it's time to sell.

A pyramid scheme relies on people paying money in, and then recruiting lots of other people to pay money in. The people at the top of the pyramid (the first in) make money and everyone else gets screwed. Simple math shows the pyramid will collapse quickly with the exponential growth required to sustain it. I encourage you to read the Wikipedia article for examples.

Real estate requires cash in for a down payment and closing costs, and enough income to sustain the mortgage loan, home owner's insurance and property taxes - all percentage based on the value of the property. The higher the price, the more cash down and income needed. I won't bore you with reiterating how we got into the last financial mess when it came to sustaining mortgages.

As housing prices continue to grow, are we truly pricing out new buyers in the long run? In other words, if buyers don't already own real property or have a large enough bag of cash, how will they get in? And if they can't get in, how will sellers get out? Do you see the analogy of the pyramidal dilemma?

Sure, people will inherit real property over time, but if that eventually becomes the only way in, it cannot sustain this model.

Housing prices are set based upon a number of factors: comparable sales in the vicinity, marketplace averages, and most importantly by the gut of those who make a percentage-based commission selling your home - a commission often shared between two agents (selling and buying), and unless completely independent, those agents must share their commission with their individual agencies. The incentive is to keep the prices high. Now I'm not knocking real estate agents or their services. It's a complicated process and their services are valuable and worthy of compensation. My issue is compensation based on a percentage of the selling price instead of a flat fee - a debate for another time.

Money Magazine just named Columbia/Ellicott City, MD, #2 of 10 in its recent Best Places to Live article. I live in Ellicott City and work in Columbia and am pleased we made this list. But the article mentioned "homes are affordable -- by Northeast standards, anyway." That's what prompted this blog. I contend homes are not "affordable" by any standard.

If you chose to stay with me, here are some details:

In 1999, the median annual household income in Maryland was $52,850 ($74,150 in Howard County). In 2009 it was $70,050 ($100,100 in Howard County).

In 1999, the median home price in Maryland was $131,913 ($174,900 in Howard County). In 2009 it was $256,217 ($340,000 in Howard County).

So, in Maryland, median annual household income rose about 35% in the last 10 years while median home prices rose 94%. Just let that sink in for a minute.

[FYI, I'm grabbing home prices from the Maryland Association of Realtors here and Maryland Median Income from the Maryland Department of Planning here. I used the PDF called "Median Income in Current Dollars for Single Years 1989 to 2009."]

I don't know about you, but my paycheck has not been growing "in this economy." Granted, home prices are not increasing like they were but these housing booms with price wars and massive price jumps are not easy to recover from. There's no such thing as a "reset". People aren't going to renegotiate or return money.

A buyer today who wants a $340,000 home in the #2 Best Place to Live according to Money Magazine will need $6,800 for a 2% down payment for an FHA-type loan or $68,000 for a 20% down payment for a conventional-type loan. Property taxes will run around $5,000/year and homeowner's Insurance close to $1,000. And then he/she will need a bunch more cash for the miscellaneous closing costs that are tacked on by everyone who can make a buck, I mean offer a professional service.

Using an example of a 5% APR 30-year fixed-rate mortgage for that $340,000 home, Principal and Interest (P&I) will run about $1,790/month for the FHA loan (remember only 2% was put down), or $1,460/month for the conventional. Even with home prices flattening, if loan rates jump, say to 8%, you'd be at a P&I of $2,445 and $1,995 respectively.

"Affordable" is a relative term. When mortgage interest rates go back up, this pyramid will grow in mass.

I guess my point is that real estate is a dangerous, if not shaky, model that our economy, both personal and national, is heavily reliant upon. It's based on personal price setting (we always deserve every penny coming to us - it's an investment) and speculation. And affordability and sustainability is based on personal income that does not keep up with housing prices and is largely out of our personal control. This adds up, to me at least, to ultimate financial disaster. Many people suffered in the last housing fiasco; many, many more will suffer if a true housing collapse occurs in the future.

If ultimately people can't afford to buy in to this scheme, the demand goes down. The people holding the property can only sell to each other. That can only work for so long. And as homeowners die off, they'll bequeath property to family who will have few to sell it to.

So what do we do about it? Excellent question. I need to give this more thought.

Perhaps we sell while we can in typical pyramid fashion and take care of ourselves. But we'd need buyers and where would we go? Maybe we telecommute from more affordable areas. I like to believe we aren't all in it for ourselves.

Perhaps home ownership no longer becomes the primary financial goal or symbol of status for Americans. I don't care if you rent or own, why should anyone else?

Perhaps Corporate America starts sharing more of the profits with its employees instead of the shareholders and executives so personal income can match living expenses. Or subsidize employee housing. Yeah, I don't see that happening any time soon. But if the work force can't afford to live within commuting distance, eventually Corporate America will have to do something.

I'd also like to see the unnecessary complications taken out of real estate. Prime example: title insurance and searches. When you buy a house, you spend money on having the title searched to ensure no one else has legal claim to the house. OK, I get it. When you refinance your own home, you must pay for this all over again. Really? I need to pay to ensure I haven't unknowingly deeded my house to someone else in a drunken act of desperation on I don't think so. Closing costs are typically outrageous and one more unnecessary hurdle to gaining home ownership.

So when pricing your home for sale, remember it's not just a return on your investment or passing along costs to the next guy. It's setting the bar long-term for your kids, grandkids, great grandkids and your fellow humans. Think about that.

Oh, I passed my house along in the divorce and kept the 401K. So I'm counting on the goodness of people to correct this course so the future isn't so scary for me, and my kids, grandkids, great grandkids and fellow humans. What do you think?


Joe said...

This scheme is not going to be affordable as the interest rates are very high in the current recession period. This project will become the center of attraction for the people

Colonial Heights Va foreclosures

Internet business at home automated system said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DawkAngel said...

A while back I found a group of people on the internet who had very clearly defined why buying a home --particularly a first home -- was nearly always a losing proposition. Unless you got very very lucky there were bills and expenses upon bills and expenses, and with that, the growing possibility of more liabilities as the home grew older.

More upsetting to me is the disparity of home prices across the US. The idea that you can take a $60k home in Ohio and plant it in the middle of southern California and suddenly it's priced 4x as high is mind boggling..

richmond va real estate listings said...

This employees rather than shareholders and executives of personal income can not match the expenses. The subsidize housing for employees. The workforce can not afford to live within a reasonable distance.

Anonymous said...

Property requires money in for a down payment and settlement costs, and enough earnings to maintain the mortgage loan, home master's insurance and property or home taxation - all percentage based on the value of the exact property or home. Matt Theriault

MMS Info said...

A while back I discovered a gathering of individuals on the web who had plainly characterized why purchasing a home - especially a first home - was about dependably a losing recommendation. Unless you got exceptionally fortunate there were bills and costs upon bills and costs, and with that, the developing probability of more liabilities as the home became more seasoned. downtown dubai for sale

Anonymous said...

"Real estate" actually consists of two assets: (1) Land (location) and (2) Improvements.

Land ownership -- the bundle of rights that includes enclosure AND, importantly, the right to purchase, at a fixed, up-front price, all future rental value deriving from the site -- is a pyramid scheme.

It doesn't take much thought to realize how this is true. Land is not wealth; it is more powerful -- it is the opportunity to create wealth. When you pay someone for land, whether to "own" or to lease it, you are paying them for nothing. They provide literally nothing in return. They have paid to establish themselves as an obstacle to life and production on a slice of Earth for eternity, and they are simply collecting bribes (rent) to step aside and allow life and production to proceed. There is no incentive for a landowner, in his role as landowner, to return value to people who pay him in his role as landowner. It's a system in which the earliest, clean-titled entrants into the gatekeeping privilege benefit from every new entrant. And it's the perfect scam because everyone on Earth, by existing, needs what the owners of the scheme have.

Mike said...

Anonymous - well said! And thank you for not posting a URL to real estate for sale.

dawnofanewhorizon said...

Pretty section of content, I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts.
Real Estate Investment

Unknown said...

Fast House Sale. We Buy As-Is, Fast For Cash! Easy Process. 24hr Offer. See Info 100% No Obligation · No Hassles · Cash-Offer Now · Fast Closing · Honest, Fair, Fast Offer Types: Distressed Property, Vacant Houses, Damaged Houses, Pending Foreclosure, Shorts Sale. We Buy Houses Jacksonville Florida

aliyaa said...

The houses for sale in boca raton can help you find your perfect property for sale Boca Raton, while our power broker, can help you close the deal of your dreams!

Unknown said...

Softhof is one of the company which provide to their customer reliable and cheapest free web hosting in Pakistan. Searching for a free domain name? Buy one of our hosting packages and get a domain for free! More than 700 domain extensions waiting for you! Softhof provide web hosting service in Pakistan with free domain name in .com, .net, .org, .biz. Free web hosting account and domain in Pakistan, self create your own website in no cost, get best professional hosting services for free in Pakistan.
Web Hosting in Pakistan

Anonymous said...

Nice article
Demetrios Florakis

Anonymous said...

Reading this year's later from Columbia, MD also. Both the housing and rental markets are obscene. I've lived here most of my life, and I remember in the 90s a $300,000 home was a mini mansion. Now you need another 50k on top of that for a townhouse/starter home. What used to buy you a townhouse now gets you a small rinky dink condo. Also 1 bedroom apartments in a non-slummy complex in Columbia and surrounding area are gonna run you $1,300/ month plus utilities. How can young people afford that? The housing and rental market is pricing out everyone but the rich. If you can find a roommate or you're married that helps, but still. The fact is the price of housing is too high for most people to afford it. It's more affordable in Baltimore, but then Baltimore is also more dangerous so...

Anonymous said...

Thank you for helping people get the information they need. Great stuff as usual. Keep up the great work!!! Bucharest real estate for sale

Sophie Grace said...

I've always enjoyed reading blog on real estate and this particular post was especially good. Thanks for sharing it. keith flint net worth

Rafail said...

Find properties for sale in bahria town Islamabad, Zem Builders Pakistan's No.1 Real Estate Portal. Get complete details of properties and available amenities from Find bahria town Rawalpindi residential houses, homes, properties, compare houses for sale prices in bahria town Rawalpindi.